Archive

Appendix 2

Appendix 2: The Reception of the Acts of Paul and Thekla in Late Antique Sermons (Pseudo-Chrysostom and Severus of Antioch) The close reading of the Life offered in Chapter One above is designed to illustrate the literary activity of one writer on one text. The Life is a literary paraphrase of the ATh that exhibits certain choices in language and technique unique to its author and setting. Read more

Appendix 3

Appendix 3: Early Byzantine Miracle Collections: A Select Catalogue The list below comprises a select (alphabetical) catalogue of miracle collections in Greek from early Byzantium, fifth to eighth centuries. [1] While I have included the Miracles of Thekla as part of this catalogue, I would at the same time seek to distinguish the Miracles from these other collections on the basis of… Read more

References

References Accorinti, D., ed. 1996. Nonno di Panopoli—Parafrasi del Vangelo di S. Giovanni, Canto XX: Introduzione, testo critico, traduzione e commento. Pisa. Achtemeier, P. 1970. “Towards the Isolation of Pre-Markan Miracle Catenae.” JBL 89:265–291. Adler, W. 1989. Time Immemorial: Archaic History and its Sources in Christian Chronography from Julius Africanus to George Syncellus. Washington, DC. … Read more

Preface

To the memory of C. J. Ruijgh and C. M. J. Sicking Preface Epic is concerned with the past. It depicts heroes that are larger than life and accomplish their exploits in a bygone age outside the reach of ordinary mortals. Often, and certainly in the case of the Homeric tradition, epic’s very language is a representation of the past, in the form of vocabulary, syntax,… Read more

Chapter 1. Peripheral and Nuclear Semantics

Chapter 1. Peripheral and Nuclear Semantics In recent years a number of studies on Homeric versification have appeared which aim to show a way out of the deadlock at which the study of the Homeric formula ended in the ’60s and ’70s. [1] Milman Parry’s analysis of the systematic precision in the use of noun-epithet formulas, as presented in his 1928 dissertation,… Read more

Chapter 2. Formula, Context, and Synonymy

Chapter 2. Formula, Context, and Synonymy Milman Parry’s 1928 dissertation, [1] insofar as it drew upon and continued the work of earlier scholars, provided a functional dimension to the findings of such earlier scholars as Düntzer, Ellendt, Witte, and Meister. Parry pointed out that the coexistence of semantically equivalent but metrically different forms in the Homeric diction was not only the creation… Read more

Chapter 3. How Oral is Oral Composition?

Chapter 3. How Oral is Oral Composition? In the two preceding chapters the main interest was the question of the formula, which we approached from a number of perspectives. The present chapter will start widening the horizons by asking the question that ought perhaps to be at the center of the study of oral poetry: the question of orality itself. What does it mean for a poem… Read more

Chapter 4. Mimesis as Performance

Chapter 4. Mimesis as Performance The reputation of the first chapter of Auerbach’s Mimesis among classicists has risen and fallen with the tides of fashion in Homeric studies. The notion of Homeric privileging of the part over the whole, argued for in the essay on Odysseus’s scar, gained wide currency at a time when scholars were concerned with parataxis and paratactic composition as the hallmark of Homer’s… Read more

Chapter 5. The Poetics of Deixis

Chapter 5. The Poetics of Deixis Deixis is what speakers do to locate themselves in space and time, with respect to things, events, and each other. When speaking, it is impossible not to be deictic, not to “be in” the context of one’s discourse. Not being deictic is not communicating, not being in a situation, not being. This is what happens in some narratives, whose narrator disappears… Read more

Chapter 6. Storytelling in the Future

Chapter 6: Storytelling in the Future The question whether the Greek epic tradition is a matter of “truth” or of “fiction” remains a central issue in Homeric scholarship, and any answer to it betrays one’s stance with regard to a host of other issues, such as text, tradition, and authorship. Opinions are divided as to whether the Homeric rendition of the heroic past is wholly traditional, and… Read more